Update on Australia’s refugee policy

By Mel O’Brien

A month ago I wrote about the positive progress of the Australian government under Kevin Rudd. I mentioned in particular the changes the Rudd government has made to refugee policy, but still recognised the need to address the issue of mandatory detention of refugees. Well, the government was listening! This week Chris Evans, the federal Minister for Immigration and Citizenship made a speech at the Australian National University in Canberra outlining the government’s ‘New Directions in Detention- Restoring Integrity to Australia’s Immigration System’.

The Howard government painted a portrait of refugees as "queue jumpers"- people not waiting their turn to emigrate legally- an image which appealed to a certain percentage of the population- the type that tends to watch ‘current affairs’ programmes. Yet their refugee policies brought much shame on Australia, and led to such disastrous results as the 10 month detention in 2004-5 of a mentally ill Australian citizen, Cornelia Rau (who was finally compensated by the Rudd government); suicide attempts by detainees; and the mistaken deportation of Australian citizens such as Vivian Alvarez Solon. As Evans points out "long-term detention became the reality for large numbers of detainees".

Evans points out that

"Enormous damage has been done to our international reputation. On 14 occasions over the last decade, the United Nations Human Rights Committee made adverse findings against Australia in immigration detention cases, finding that the detention in those cases violated the prohibition on arbitrary detention in article 9(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights."

It is refreshing to hear a government recognise that people become refugees because they are escaping circumstances in which their physical and mental health and even life is in peril.

Evans states:

"Labor rejects the notion that dehumanising and punishing unauthorised arrivals with long-term detention is an effective or civilised response. Desperate people are not deterred by the threat of harsh detention – they are often fleeing much worse circumstances. The Howard government’s punitive policies did much damage to those individuals detained and brought great shame on Australia. Strong border security and humane and risk-based detention policies are not incompatible. They are both hallmarks of a mature, confident and independent nation."

However, Labor is not rejecting mandatory detention per se. In fact, of the government’s new "seven key immigration values", which "will result in a risk-based approach to the management of immigration clients", mandatory detention is seen as essential. However, the use of mandatory detention will be severely curtailed.

The Government’s seven key immigration values are:

  1. Mandatory detention is an essential component of strong border control.
  2. To support the integrity of Australia’s immigration program, three groups will be subject to mandatory detention:
    1. all unauthorised arrivals, for management of health, identity and security risks to the community
    2. unlawful non-citizens who present unacceptable risks to the community and
    3. unlawful non-citizens who have repeatedly refused to comply with their visa conditions.
  3. Children, including juvenile foreign fishers and, where possible, their families, will not be detained in an immigration detention centre (IDC).
  4. Detention that is indefinite or otherwise arbitrary is not acceptable and the length and conditions of detention, including the appropriateness of both the accommodation and the services provided, would be subject to regular review.
  5. Detention in immigration detention centres is only to be used as a last resort and for the shortest practicable time.
  6. People in detention will be treated fairly and reasonably within the law.
  7. Conditions of detention will ensure the inherent dignity of the human person.

So, while the government is retaining mandatory detention, the application of it will be completely different, with an emphasis on risk management. What it seems is that the government will detain people for initial health, identity and security risk assessment; and it will detain people who commit crimes, are potentially dangerous due to mental illness, or breach their visa conditions repeatedly. All seem to me to be acceptable reasons for detention of a person. Applicants for a visa for any country have to pass an identity and security risk assessment before they are permitted to obtain a visa or residence permit, and again at the border control upon entry, so the detention of refugees simply enables this process to take place on-site. Of course, detention is only acceptable provided that detention conditions and the length of the detention are proportionate to the situation. For example, detention conditions of a person for health assessment should not be the same as those for a person who has committed a crime. The review of detention length and conditions is essential, and it remains to be seen how regularly these reviews will be conducted, but hopefully it will be a matter of every few months. The new policy will be one requiring the government to justify, rather than to presume detention.

In 2004, the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) conducted a National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention, and determined that Australia was in breach of many of its obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC). In fact, Australia was in breach of its obligations under no less than 13 articles of CROC, denying children in immigration detention such rights as the right to enjoy the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Article 24(1)) and the right to an appropriate education on the basis of equal opportunity (Article 28(1)). The decision to no longer detain children means Australia will be complying with its obligations under CROC, which maintains that detention of children should be a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time (Article 37(b)).

To ensure these ‘values’ are implemented in accordance with Australia’s obligations under human rights law, the government has commenced work on an implementation plan to be developed in conjunction with community interest groups and agencies such as HREOC. This bodes well for the new immigration policies, given that the Rudd government has already made changes in accordance with previous recommendations from HREOC.

There are many other changes to the system outlined in Minister Evans’ speech, relating to the day-to-day functionality of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship, as well as the detention infrastructure (including new management, removal of fencing, redevelopment). So it seems the government is really planning a complete overhaul of the immigration system to render it fair and treat asylum seekers with the dignity they deserve. The future looks bright for potential asylum seekers fleeing persecution and coming to Australia.

 

Be Sociable, Share!

One thought on “Update on Australia’s refugee policy

  1. Dear sir or madam,
    We are SomaliBantu refugees living despretely in Yemen for the past 19 years and have been applying for resettlment world wide. We can not go back to our country becuse we are afraid of being persecuted.
    This is what happened to US:
    Background ( somalibantu)The peaple known as Somali Bantus,also refered to as Jareer are the indigenouis inhabitants of the land adjacent to rivers Shabelle and Juba in the South of Somalia. DescriptionSomali Bantus are characterized by short curly dense hair,large nose,and large lips,prominant cheeks,strong jaws,low chin,circular face and muscular body. They live mainly on farming,craftsmanship,building, carpentry etc.They are more skilled in these things than the other ordinay Somalis. They are abused and discriminated from the others.They are neither allowed to marry nor are married from the other Somalis. They are called with bad names such as, nose widy, Hard haired and Slave as polite insult. They are hindered to have a proper education or jockeying agood position in government seats.They live ill-heathly in their regions and their residences are not developed educationally, healthly and economically. The civil war has further worsened the social and economical conditions of the Somali Bantus.Since they are unarmed,they became easy targets from which the armed tribesmen have no fear of compensation claims for loss of life,property or pride damage.most of their indigenous property have been robbed.Farmlands, maize and burried corn etc were deposseded. They have become vulnerable. The other Somalis use every means possible to intimidate,physical torture ,threatening,rape,armed robbery or kill just to make the unarmed Bantus flee from land. Some specific claims of Somali Bantu refugees in Yemen They are not willing to return home because their property are in the hands of others at gunpoint. We are scared to return to avoid continuation of persecution. Being in a condition of poor life, unemployment and education, the other Somalis still horrify us and remind us of the bad names such as Slave and so on.They still humilate us for our race and our living in Yemen. Unlike the other Somalis, they don’t have financial support from outside and are living in a very bad situation having no humaniterian aid or health care. What are the needs of the Somali Bantus in Yemen? They need to have complete protection and security, safe environment and employment.They need to live among society who don’t abuse or discriminate them,but respect them.To have a possetive future, advanced education ,health care,and integrate equally with the society. Somali Bantus in yemen live mainly in Alkharas camp, Albasatin in Aden, Sana’a and are scattered in other regions.They have a leader who can give the estimate census. Somali Bantus owe gratitute,favor and appreciation in advance for those who are very much concerned about their plight. please reply soon. Many thanks ,
    Chairman of Somali Bantu.
    Hassan husein Ido
    secretary , Mohamed Abshir Dhuro
    Deputy chairman, Moalim Moh’ed
    chief of somali bantu
    Shiekh Mohamed madan
    Contact Address: Kharas camp : Block 31-19tele: 00967/ 770604594
    e-mail address: somalibaatu@yahoo.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>